Entry: entry-1000185 | Stream: ["future-forecasting-group", "remote-viewing"] | Your level: free | Entry access: free

A Major Trump Event may change the POTUS timeline

A Major Trump Event may change the POTUS timeline

A Major Trump Event may change the POTUS timeline

Narrator

[Imported from YouTube transcript]

It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops, the world stops for a moment. Feels like a shake-up. Very like rare. Like this feels like either hasn't happened in a long time or maybe is the first time something like this is happening. Like a herd, people are swayed and moved in a desired direction. Sheep dogs of social media.

And I wrote here this has a the potential to be a dark time. And it does have like a surprise, unexpected, unpredictable kind of feeling to it. And that king with an air of oil here would have some kind of like coup type situation. The idea here is of a new leader stepping in, feeding off of the angst of the people.

Today is Wednesday, March 4th, 2026. I'm getting a timestamp on this one.

Uh no easy way to go through this target, but this is some very heavy information that is timely and relevant over the next few years. It's a future-facing target.

We're sharing this target on the back end of the strikes in Iran. This target is not related to Iran, but things just feel heavy right now. So, I say this sincerely to those of you watching, proceed with caution. I'm joined with Naim, Edward, Dick, and Daz. We're getting ready to go through this week's project. All viewers are still blind to the target. I'm going to do a quick check-in with the team starting with Naim. Just getting your reactions from the target, Naim.

This had a lot of um high-level governmental uh reaction to something probably not very good. That was my uh my takeaway from this one.

Yeah, that's a common theme among all of you. Edward?

Uh some some of the projects we work just seem bigger than other ones, you know? Some targets just seem bigger than other ones in their level of importance.

This felt like one of that higher level.

Uh some of the stuff in there I I hope I'm not right about, um but it seemed like a um somebody's getting replaced, maybe.

Yeah. Yeah, it's it's a big one. And I do feel that the tasking was was pretty specific on this, too. It was it was pretty well done.

like it. Yeah. Dick?

I had a beautiful little girl picking flowers in a field and someone gave her a puppy.

No, wait. That was the That was the other target.

[laughter]

Um I I thought this target was primarily a person. My My focus was primarily a person and um not exactly the person you'd think he was in private.

Mhm. Some things in the background that were interesting.

Yeah, for sure.

Does?

Very interesting. Yeah, I had some government societal weird warring between two groups, maybe aggression, yeah, I don't know, civil war-y type anger, coup-type data.

Yeah, in a nutshell, yeah, you had all the worst-case stuff, I would say.

All right, gentlemen. We're going to go through our sessions in the order we just had. So, I'm going to start with my aim.

If you can walk us through your data.

Feels like a shake-up. Um very like rare, like this feels like either hasn't happened in a long time or maybe is the first time something like this is happening.

Um and it does have like a surprise, unexpected, unpredictable kind of feeling to it.

You know, secretive, collaborative group, decision-makers, authority figures, top-notch, top-rank feel to them. They can pull the strings. They can shake and move and and make things happen.

Uh it has a debate or crisis management theme to it. Um I get the idea of an uprising and and the idea of implementing controls in an emergency situation.

Almost like the lockdowns, you know what I mean? Like they're talking like, "Oh, well, this happened, so in this situation, we're going to have to do something that we don't usually do, like like a lockdown or an emergency measures type uh discussion or maybe approval or something like that.

Uh uprising and rebellion, uh you know, I mentioned that before, but it's something about this has that feel. So, maybe something's getting out of control.

And it does feel like putting a lid on it, putting the fire out, stunting its growth, you know, trapping it in, blocking it in, preventing it, all that all that kind of stuff, applying the pressure.

And it has a walls closing in kind of feel to it. Hurting the sheep. That was the kind of last impression I had there.

All right, lots going on with that one, I mean, very rare and unusual type response that that this triggers.

Yeah. So, here's the person up there, they're doing the speech thing, and these are people over here, they're part of this person's team, and they're they're watching this person as they're on there.

And they back the person, they've groomed this person and prepared for the moment there. It's like a new candidate is presented or brought forth, very much groomed, galvanizing people's emotions and gathering them up to be exploited at the optimum time.

The idea here is of a new leader stepping in.

Feeding off of the angst of the people.

It's like the death of a king or a ruler.

The country stops. The world stops for a moment.

An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment.

This level of magnitude.

The people don't know what to do next.

There is shock and confusion.

The replacement is ready to step in.

The people look to this person for a vision and direction.

They are vulnerable and emotional.

And that this is where I had to really kind of this is a big deal. Whatever this tasking is, man, this is some big heavy duty stuff going on here.

This person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them possibly due to a death.

Yeah, and when you see how it ties into the tasking and to everything else, I think it's really going to drive home on that one, Edward.

All right, Dick. Let's take a look at your session.

And Naim had the idea of the sheep. I had like a herd. People are swayed and moved in a desired direction.

Sheep dogs of social media heard them.

And then I saw somebody out in the open on grass, like a really finely manicured grass, and then I kept seeing a wisp disappear, a wisp of smoke.

And that was a that replayed like three or four times.

Don't know what to make of that.

Interesting session. Yeah, a lot of neat stuff in there, Dick. A lot of crossover. I'm going to move to Daz, who I think is going to talk to us about civil war. So, let's let's hear it, Daz.

Maybe. Maybe not.

[laughter]

But something felt off here. It felt like I see two different groups of people. They're opposed, they're angry, they're getting aggressive, they're name-calling. They're all very vocal. Um you know, my whole RV session had a definite USA feeling to it.

And it felt a bit like this, you know, and again it feels very American cuz it felt like one group was red, one group was blue here. So, very opposing sides or opposing forces here and a real argument.

Uh and it feels like it's a real close future event here, a volatile situation, very angry and emotional. And it feels like it's based around a decision or choice that has to be made. And it feels like it's going to be voted upon.

Uh and I wrote here this has a the potential to be a dark time uh underlying cuz it feels like that that's quite a big probability here. And that came with an AOL here of some kind of like coup type situation. So, a change in leader situation there. Okay. So, this week what you guys were looking at is a future-based target that has significant implications. And the tasking was to look at who is the president on January 15th, 2030.

So, it was a very specific tasking looking ahead in the 2030 on that particular day who's sitting in the White House. I'll give you the tasking right now.

Remote viewers to view the person who's acting as the president of the United States in the White House January 15th, 2030. They're to observe the president here and their interactions at the presidential residence. I'm going to go through a little bit of feedback and then I'll go into the analysis here, but overall what I think you guys got was the most luminous aspects of that is how this person came into power and it doesn't sound like it was a um an easy transition or process. There's a death uh and followed by new rules are being signed and then the herd is getting swayed. There we have it, friends. Very heavy data um in terms of interpreting that, I mean, are we looking at

I don't you know what? Let me kick it to you guys for your thoughts on that.

Well, it felt heavy in the session.

Um I mean, if I had to look at my session as if as if I didn't do it and try to figure out what was going on there, I'd say that there there would be a possibility that Trump might not make it to the end of this term. Mhm. Um if that were to happen, J.D. Vance would then become the president >> Mhm. and then he would be prepared then to run uh for the presidency in the next election then.

Um that's kind of the person when I was drawing that person uh it's kind of kind of the person I had in mind. Yeah.

Um someone who's being groomed now to to run for the next in the next election.

I completed my session and we had a few a week ago and while I was thinking about it, I thought damn.

I think I was looking at Marco Rubio and I thought I think this target is they want to know who the next president is.

And let me show you something.

I think it I think I was seeing Marco Rubio. So, I I'm throwing my hat in the ring for Marco. I don't know.

Uh it's a hard one. I wouldn't like to say who Yeah, a person, to be honest. Um what I find interesting is the target was to describe the next uh US president. Mhm. Um but we didn't I mean, we kind of did that, but we didn't do that. We actually all described a very volatile situation or series of situations. So, whatever happens, uh I think uh the US is in for a very hard, dark, damaging time. Yeah, I would say that. So, this guy is it Vance or is it Rubio? Yeah, I don't know.

I don't know, man. We'll see.

We will see. You know what's interesting is that in this piece here where the the the with the industry the tech industries that are backing this person and the blockchain based voting system approval well JD Vance is buddies with those guys.

Do you know what the funny thing is as well Edward? The one of the main backers of Polymarket is is Trump's family and son. They're on the board.

Yeah.

Oh yeah, man. Wow, this is this is going to be a really good one to look back on.

This will be really fun to look back on this one. Oh, we'll just have to wait and see.

Yeah, time will tell. So for everybody watching who do you think? Who who who's going to be on the list? Who do you think is going to be the president by January 15th, 2030? Let let us know your comments. There's a lot more like I said in your own analysis as you piece this together and how to piece this together and what it all means, but it does feel important. This was a very strong session by all the viewers.

Yeah, a timestamp man early, too.

Yeah. Yeah, we did.

All right, so on behalf of Naim, Edward, Dick, Daz and the rest of the future forecasting group, I'm done as Snappy the second.

Thanks for watching.

Watch the full debrief at ffgrv.com.

[music]